TARGETING PROTEST IN LONDON: HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION WITHIN
A GLOBAL STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
NOTE: The tactics in this program, and the mobilization of “Citizen Volunteers” are designed to appear bizarre effectively resulting in disbelief.
MAGNUS OLSSON SWEDISH WHISTLEBLOWER
NANO BRAIN IMPLANT
MIND TECH ENTERPRISES
MIND CONTROL – THE NEURAL REVOLUTION
*** HISTORY & OVERVIEW OF AN EMERGING GLOBAL PARADIGM ***
REUTERS’ OUTDATED 2012 ARTICLE
What kind of privacy and security measures are needed when a machine can read your mind?
In recent decades, meetings between information technology, biotechnology, and neuroscience have produced entirely new research, which are developing new, previously unknown products and services.
From nanotechnology opportunities for computer-brain integration an entirely new civil-military research has evolved to develop communication between computers and human brain, minds / thoughts, called synthetic or artificial telepathy.
Understanding how the human brain works is not only leading to innovations in medicine, but also providing new models for energy-efficient, fault tolerant and adaptive computing technologies.
Ongoing research into artificial neural networks (signal processing) systems, and evolutionary, genetic algorithms, have resulted in technologies that can now construct a self-learning computer by programming itself, and among other things can read the human brain’s memories, feelings and knowledge.
THE PROGRESSION: SCIENTIST CAN NOW READ YOUR MEMORIES
Bioelectronics and a miniaturized signal processing systems in the brain may play into the brain functional architecture and through the spoken language analyze the signal’s meaning. It is about creating a computer model of the brain and and the resulting evidence providing the answer to what a person is, and more importantly, what is conscience? What a responsibility is? And, from whence arises our norms and values, etc.?
None of these questions on can be answered without copying the brain’s functional architecture, toying with it today using nanotechnology that is poised to redirect our entire human existence, our minds, body and spirit on Earth.
The Research Council Ethics Committee of Europe wrote, revealed in the link the medical ethics and Nanotechnology in 2004:
NANOTECHNOLOGY AND ETHICAL CONDUCT OF
RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS
As with everything in life there will always be a polar opposite, in this case, of negative and positive attributes which then leads to how does this apply to nanotechnology?
Plus and Minus of Nanotechnology
+ It is good to give medicine into the brain via the blood-brain barrier.
+ It is good to insert electrodes into the brain to give sight to a blind or to control a prosthetic hand.
+ It is good to use nanotechnology to stem terrorism on innocent people.
+ It is good for those who can afford to exploit nanotechnology for their own health and their own prosperity.
– It’s not good when the particles that enter the body through the lungs and stresses the heart and other organs.
– It’s not good if the technology used to read or to influence others’ thoughts, feelings and intentions.
– There is no good if the same technology used to control and manage the innocent people.
– It’s not good for the poor, who do not have access to the advanced technology.
Brain Computer Interfaces will understand the brain – create Human like Artificial Intelligence – change the world of Information and comunication technologies (ICT) – change the way humans comunicate.
1. The Neural Code:
The fundamental electrophysiological rouls and governing principles of the brain that define the information in human cognition.
The electrical language of the mind – the information of your thoughts is coded by defined electrical patterns
2. The Human Genome and the Neural code:
Just as the human genome is governed by the information coded in a series of *nucleotides, the nural code has a correlate organinization to its information.
Computer science and neuroscience are beginning to understand the fundamentals of this coded information.
Neural Code: Components
▪ Spatial Encoding
▪ Temporal Encoding
– Action potential firing
– Frequency encoding
◆ Frequency band
◆ Power alteration
*Nucleotides = (biochemistry) the monomer comprising DNA or RNA biopolymer molecules. Each nucleotide consists of a nitrogenous heterocyclic base (or nucleobase), which can be either a double-ringed purine or a single-ringed pyrimidine; a five-carbon pentose sugar (deoxyribose in DNA or ribose in RNA); and a phosphate group.
TRANSHUMANISM AND THE FUTURE OF HUMANITY BY 2030
WHO’S RUNNING THE SHOW? BILDERBERG GROUP, COUNCIL
OF FOREIGN RELATIONS AND THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION
*** FOOD FOR THOUGHT ***
Quesions that demand answers are: Is it ethical for researchers to retain parts of uploaded minds into the advanced AI systems (copied biologically conscious) that remains when the person is deceased?
The scientific psychological approach studies the mechanisms underlying human thought processes.
In the cognitive psychology realm, the main areas of research focus on memory, perception, knowledge, representation, language, problem solving, decision making, awareness and intelligence. The question then becomes, how do we reconcile these cognitive realms using mind invasive technology, morally, for example satellites which can read thought.
THE PROGRESSION: SATELLITES AND MIND /
Let’s take a trip back in time to fully understand advanced satellite surveillance, advancement of Neural Link (Brain-Chip) “harassment” technologies with the ability to beam human voices into the head today in widespread use, and sadly available to ruthless, unscrupulous people. The Neurophone is one of the first patents and connected to NSA agendas.
It is imperative to understand the capabilities that created today’s covert and overt corruption at an unimaginable heinous, high-tech level and the role of human experimentation overseen by unified military and intel government agencies both with a vested interest in its use.
These technologies are covered by military and civilian agency secrecy orders, mostly obtained under the US Inventions Secrecy Act, of 1951. There are currently over 5,000 hidden devices, with many computer-based and satellite or satellite to drone facilitated. The technologies are 100% being used for ongoing official criminal applications focused on “Social Engineering”.
*** EARLY RESEARCH ***
DR. FLANGAN DESCRIBES THE HISTORY OF THE NEUROPHONE:
THE ABILITY TO HEAR BEAMED SOUND THROUGH THE SKIN
The first Neurophone was made when I was 14 years old, 1958. When I was 15 years old, I gave a lecture at the Houston Amateur Radio Club, during which I demonstrated the Neurophone. The next day I was contacted by a reporter from the Houston Post. He said that he had a relative who was nerve-deaf from spinal meningitis and asked if we might try the Neurophone on his relative.
The test was a success.
The day after that, an article on the Neurophone as a potential hearing aid for the deaf appeared and went out on the international wire services. The publicity grew over the next two years. In 1961, Life Magazine came to our house and lived with us for over a week. They took thousands of pictures and followed me around from dawn to dusk. The article appeared in the September 14, 1962 issue. After that, I was invited to appear on the I’ve got a Secret show hosted by Gary Moore. The show was telecast from the NBC studios in New York. During the show, I placed electrodes from the Neurophone on the lower back of Bess Meyerson while the panel tried to guess what I was doing to her. She was able to ‘hear’ a poem that was being played through the Neurophone electrodes. The poem was recorded by Andy Griffith, another guest on the show.
Since the signal was only perceived by Ms. Meyerson, the panel could not guess what I was doing to her. As a result of the Life Magazine article and exposure on the Gary Moore Show, we received over a million letters about the invention. The U.S. Patent Office started giving us problems. The examiner said that the device could not possibly work, and refused to issue the patent until 1967. It was only after my lawyer and I took a working model to the patent office that the patent was issued. This was an unusual move since inventors rarely bring their inventions to the patent examiner. The examiner said that he would allow the patent to issue if we could make a deaf employee of the patent office hear with the device. The employee was able to hear and the patent for the Neurophone was issued.A research company, the Huyck Corporation, became interested in the invention. Huyck was owned by a very large and powerful Dutch paper company with offices throughout the world.
They began researching the device and were favorably impressed but because of the problems with the patent office they dropped the project. At Huyck I met two friends who remained close to me for many years, Dr. Henri Marie Coanda, the father of fluid dynamics, and G. Harry Stine, scientist and author. Harry Stine wrote a book called The Silicon Gods (Bantam Books), which was about the potential of the Neurophone as a brain-to-computer connecting interface device. The next stage of Neurophone research began when I went to work for Tufts University as a research scientist. Together with a Boston based corporation, we were involved in a project to develop a language between man and dolphin. Our contracts were from the United States Naval Ordnance Test Station out of China Lake, California. The senior scientist on the project was my close friend and business partner Dr. Dwight Wayne Batteau, Professor of Physics and Mechanical Engineering at Harvard and Tufts.
The above details of the history of Neurophone are remiss.
Whether intentionally or not, left out is a vital key for a complete understanding of the NSAs involvement with this specific technology excerpted below. The fact is the NSA confiscated Patrick Flanagan’s Neurophone and it an ensuing Court for the technology’s return.
NEUROPHONE FULLY DETAILED HISTORY
Dr. Flanagan would subsequently go on to patented the Neurophone rightfully as his own invention in 1972. This was only after the invention was dissected under Secrecy Orders, and returned to him to remove the Secrecy Order, which then followed by patenting the Advanced Neurophone. Today the ability to hear the voice of the operator at the helm of beamed systems and devices directly into the human brain, in many variations work hand in hand with advanced versions of brain scanners providing feedback and brain wave vocabulary software, deciphering thought with directed energy and Electromagnetic Weapons. Amongst these advancements are also inventions that can affect the weather, cause earthquakes etc., etc., etc.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT BINARY DISSENT
TRANSHUMANISM: THE BIG FRAUD TOWARDS DIGITAL SLAVERY
“The transhumanism is an international movement that states that adding technological implants and inserting DNA will improve the human being. However, the transhumanists hide two subjects: the use of technological implants as a weapon against the citizen and the method they are developing their dangerous projects with, which is suspected to be illicit human experiments in the world. Technological implants like brain nanobots might cause losing mind control and thus, the carriers can be controlled by others and lose their autonomy, they can be spied permanently with the cerebral internet and can lose their privacy their memory can be deleted and can loose their identity. Thus, the humans who carry technological implants can be permanently spied on, mentally controlled and they lose their identity, becoming a human slave at the service of the transnational companies and the economic powers. An objective analysis reveals that transhumanism is only an intellectual swindle that leads to digital fascism, a society where a millionaire elite will govern citizens with technological implants, who will be digital slaves at the service of an oligarchy.”
FACT OR FICTION, YOU DECIDE…
INTERNET OF BODIES GOOGLED LINKS
METHOD FOR VERIFYING HUMAN IDENTITY DURING
ELECTRONIC SALES TRANSACTIONS
DETAILED PATENT LINK
*BLACKROCK: THE AGE OF TRANSHUMANISM HAS BEGUN…*
TRANSHUMANISM AND RADICAL NANOTECHNOLOGY
Fourth on their nanotechnology wish list are nano-robots that can step by step redesign the human body according to their ideas of “posthuman” perfection. Other nano-robots shall, fifth, make “atom-by-atom copies of the brain”, sixth, implement brain-computer-interfaces for “mind uploading”, seventh, build ultra-small and ultra-fast computers for “mindperfection” and “superintelligence”, and, eighth, revive today’s cryonics patients to let them participate in the bright future.”
Charles Darwin collected on his time in a variety of materials to describe the diversity of species and to announce his great work in 1859, if the origin of species (evolution theory)
Just as Charles Darwin collected the amounts of material, now played human neurons and nervous systems in bit by bit, in order to simulate the human brain and nervous system of the computer models. As computers developed enough power, research will be able to simulate a human brain in real-time.
Ethical aspects of so-called ICT (Information and Comunication Technologies) implants in the human body are discussed for several years at the European level of The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies under the guidance of such Professor Goran Hermerén. One of the recommendations is that the dangers of ICT implants will be discussed in EU countries. But this has in any event not occurred in Sweden.
By using the new technology to read and copy human neurons and nervous systems so computers can learn ontologies and later “artificial intelligence”, an intelligence that has no ethical foundations and values.
“Artificial intelligence” is a research area that aims to develop computer-based applications that behave and act in a manner that is indistinguishable from human behavior.
The next step in computer development, computers / software that imitate humans. These computers come with their artificial intelligence to be able to threaten the man’s integrity, identity, autonomy and spirituality.
Read link “The Combination of Brain Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: Applications and Challenges”
BCI AND AI: APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES
Years of recordings of people using the new brain chips and broadband technology visualizes piecemeal man’s own self, this is copied to the new more powerful computers.
In Sweden, a radio program with Asa Wikfors, Associate Professor of Theoretical Philosophy, Lars Bergstrom Professor Emeritus of Philosophy and Martin Ingvar, Professor of Neurophysiology talks about the mind, brain implants and how the view of man’s essence in the future will be able to change.
Some of the research with brain implants (ICT) to clone the human brain is conducted, according to many sources of criminal, without informed consent. This is probably because the ethical appeal cannot be approved for life-long computerized study of brain implants, where the consequences for the individual is less than the benefits of the research.
Illegal computer cloning could lead to unprecedented physical, psychological and legal consequences for man and society. Illegal data cloning also involves researchers doing everything in their power to bring technology to the ICT implants, i.e., read and copy human thought and logically, due to immoral issues are not disclosed.
Nanoscience and biological implants can lead to serious problems if the technology is used in ways that violate people’s privacy. It is almost impossible to find electronic components, when incorporated in nanoscale particles. Businesses and governments and and will use this new technology to find out things about people in a whole new way. Therefore, nanotechnology will also require new laws and regulations, just as the development of computers has contributed to the enactment of such Personal Data Act.
PERSONAL DATA ACT PROTECTION
In Sweden, Swedish Professors also ask, how can you prevent and control the unauthorized use of nanotechnology, although there are legislation? Traceability, or rather the scarcity of traceability, is a perennial topic of debate on ethics, risk and safety. Another recurring theme is the monitoring, how nanotechnology can be used for monitoring purposes, where the individual or group is unaware of the surveillance and unable to find out if she / they are supervised (e) or not.
The government and their ethical advice, according to the EU has a responsibility to inform and educate the community in this area of research. This has not been entrusted to the government who are aware of the technologies since 2003.
That some of today’s important scientific breakthroughs in nanotechnology / bioelectronics information are not published is because the established academic, financial and political centers of power globally want to preserve their interests and protect unethical research on humans. Research and its implications are misleading in relation to the judiciary and traditional medical diagnostics. It also goes against all human rights conventions and specifically Nuremberg.
Instead, Sweden and Europe, through their political gatekeepers favors confidential unethical civilian-military research on the civilians, as does the USA population during the development of software and networking technologies for medical and military surveillance. The focused goal in this specific type of inhumane research makes research progress and thus gaining new paradigm insights.
In this way Sweden, for example, could use progress to solve many of its current political problems and be able to make an international pioneer work, supposedly for the benefit of all mankind.
Dear Reader, note that the creator of the bulk of this information, Magnus Olsson, MindTech Sweden, has the same desire of many across the USA and globally obviously. The goal remains to create awareness and the awareness that many of the new technologies described are developed by testing on the civilian population in his country, Sweden joining with the rest of the world, and it happening to civilians without consent and / or knowledge, and this happening for DECADES leading to a state of high perfection, yet advanced technologies in ongoing research, TESTING, and development programs.
Mindtech Sweden is cooperating with the media and the Swedish Church to try to push the ethical debate that the EU research council and Professor Goran Hermerén of whom initiated this topic back in 2004. An ethical debate that has since been blacked out by the research, official secrecy and its representatives.
Many globally recognize that there is media awareness but that also no one will not dare talk about it? It is easy not to be believed regarding mind invasive technologies for example mind reading on a large scale. And for a person who alleges that a paradigm shift in computer-brain integration and multimedia technology is already being used is immediately discredited and demonized.
Many also are aware that exposing this official global crime using open literature evidence, that portions of the information may sound like pure science fiction. You are asked to trust that it is already a reality which reiterates Magnus Olsson and due the research yourself!
FOR ALL THE GOVERNMENTS OF EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
(PSYCHOPHYSICAL MIND CONTROL)
Everyone agrees that one of the most powerful weapons targeting the civilian population throughout its development and now its perfected state is Synthetic Telepathy. Synthetic telepathy covers mind reading, and artificial intelligence. People who are involved in the development of invasive imaging of the brain and nervous system without consent have no legal protection, no human rights, and no medical help. Instead of receiving protection are strategically being diagnosed as suffering from serious mental illnesses. And once targeted, research is conducted 24 / 7 over the lifespan and aging process and until death. The most frightening implications of this technology is the serious risk that it facilitates towards totalitarian control of humans.
It is alarming that government awareness of this technology masks the effects of ongoing illegal research behind the incorrect diagnosis, and intentionally create the stage that the victim’s suffer from mental illnesses instead.
Nazi torture in concentration camps with the miniaturization of electronics has moved directly into the human brain to copy the brain signals system, a procedure that takes the lives of many people through a living Hell. It’s about a chip, however brain signal can also be monitored with the DNA a fractal antenna that works as a search engine / ESM systems in the brain. This feature can be as simple as “Googling” your memories, read minds just before consciousness and copy / clone your feelings. In regards to Neural Link / brain chips, they are described as useful in the future and to be used to “Googling” directly with the brains of tomorrow’s Internet. The scheme is to give people an expanded memory, be a communication system for the military and an escort system for Alzheimer’s disease.
To retrieve information directly from the brain and evaluate it, Olsson reports that Swedish professor’s agree, this demands an alternative nanotechnology diagnostic. The diagnosis today specifically affects successful people, and it is focused on the best and brightest negatively and results in destruction of lives. This is because the technology is being horrifically abused in the hands of official sociopaths?
Should it be accepted that automated monitoring of self-learning, computers and brain implants with synthetic telepathy can drive people to suicide and many, by those at them helm actually suggest it. This technology changes human integrity, identity and autonomy.
Should scientists and government representatives who are aware of this research deserve our further confidence when they factually are aware that these technologies developed through research on civilians without their consent are now ruthlessly widespread?
What would you do if you ran into this copying “Cloning” of the brain? When you are looking for help from the beamed psychophysical torture, accurately aware of these patents in full use today yet told that the human voices of those at the helm harrassing you are delusions? And on top of it, it is your tax dollars that pays for this research?
Can we be sure that all of the crimes committed by people reporting voices in his or her head is mental illness disease-related? Could it be, in light of open literature evidence that official perpetrators at the helm of systems and devices have so deeply manipulated, infuenced and tortured the poor by the computer-brain integration into committing crimes and asked to do so?
HOW LONG HAS THIS RESEARCH BEEN GOING ON IN SECRET?
As promised, today we will take an in-depth examination of the NSA’s global intelligence gathering network. What you are about to read will come as an eye-opener and represents the current state of the NSA’s capabilities.
THE NSA BEHIND THE CURTAIN
THE WATCHERS HAVE HAD THEIR EYES ON US FOR YEARS
Before we get to the good stuff, Olsson writes, analyzing the technology employed in the NSA’s global listening network, I thought I would deal with one more instance of disinformation. This one appeared on a Christmas Day under the title of “The Science of Santa”.
THE SCIENCE OF SANTA
Magnus Olsson and many have been watching the slow spread of the information throughout the web and the disinformation it has spawned. It has been very interesting to watch the official network of agents and spies at work. This is especially true due to your awareness.
YALE PROFESSOR DR. DELGADO’S EARLY
RESEARCH IN BRAIN CHIPS
DR. DELGADO’S HEINOUS QUOTE REGARDING BRAIN CHIP’S MASS SUE
“We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. … The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electronically control the brain. Someday armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.”
YALE PROFESSOR DR. DELGADO’S EXPERIMENTIONS USING BRAIN CHIPS:
Synthetic telepathy “Artificial Telepathy” NSA (USA) FOI (Sweden)
Synthetic telepathy “Artificial Telepathy” is the art of electronically transfering thought directly to and from a brain. The primary objectives of Mindtech, remains a humanitarian goal to expose technology that can provide point to point communication from one brain to another, to localize unwanted sources of telepathic communication, and to provide evidence that technologically implemented telepathy is possible.
THE ALLAN H. “FREY EFFECT”
Technology to block unwanted beamed technology of the voices of the operators is being investigated, however, it will likely be held under secrecy orders and unavailable to the public. However, the key objective globally is to prove the existence of the technology confirmed by patents and the official criminals who abuse it known by many names including Voice to Skull (V2K). The first article revealed in the USA was an written by Dr. Don Justesen, the Department of Veterans Affairs in Kansas and published in “American Psychologist” magazine in 1975.
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST 1975
Further objectives include investigating other computational substrates than brain tissue. Cyberbrain goals is also interested in marketing existing synthetic telepathy technology. This is for justice and medical purposes only. This tecnology, can be used to communicate with the deaf for example.
WHAT IS CYBERBRAIN
The fact is, targets reporting they are hearing the voices of people often puzzle psychiatrists, because many of them don’t fit the classic model of schizophrenia, which usually begins onset in the early twenties. The victims of Synthetic telepathy “artificial telepathy” are often well into their thirties or fourties and many have no prior history of serious mental illness. Many seem to be alert, healthy, and rational even while insisting that they can hear voices. They agree with the psychiatrists that, yes, they are depressed, but who wouldn’t be a bit depressed under such trying circumstances? To be stalked and verbally bullied every waking hour of the day is a form of mental torture.
Victims of mind rape quickly learn not to discuss their “psychological problems” with family and coworkers. It’s embarrassing, it’s bizarre, it gets very little sympathy and only serves to alarm most people. The only way that another person can “help” is to suggest that the mind rape victim see a psychiatrist, who will promptly double one’s dose of psych meds and antidepressants. The result is a very stiff medical bill, which only adds financial pain to the mix. And the verbal harassment continues by those at the helm escalates after cementing mental illness in medical records.
As they learn to endure their daily torture, Target’s can usually return to mainstream life, where they are able to carry on intelligent, coherent conversations, hold down jobs, and function quite normally. In fact, if they don’t discuss their “problem” they usually can’t be told apart from normal people on the street. Because they are normal people.
The growing number of people targeted with this technology in our society is therefore well masked. Those who continue to insist that there is a “secret society of people beaming voices into our heads” are simply laughed into silence or labelled Paranoid Schizophrenics the official goal. They are completely discredited. In fact, many have internalized the idea that they are mentally ill, and they struggle to understand how their “auditory hallucinations” could continue to seem so very, very real. They are real because it is human beings, military, police, DOD contractor experimenting at the helm.
Surprisingly, there is a tremendous amount of scientific literature and circumstantial evidence to back up that claim.
In the following posts, we will explore the history of synthetic telepathy and learn the names of the scientists who developed this sinister technology. We will also identify and examine some of the government agencies that are fielding and using this weapon of torture against innocent civilians.
BRAIN “MIND LINK” TECHNOLOGY: ELON
MUSK SHOWS NEURALINK TECHNOLOGY WORKING IN A PIG
The NSA – Behind The Billion Dollars Curtain Mega Facility in Utah
At this point, we will take an in-depth examination of the NSA’s global intelligence gathering network. What you are about to read will come as an eye-opener and represents the current state of the NSA’s capabilities. Some of this will be expected, some of it will come as a shock.
What you will learn is that the technology that underpins this global listening network is a lot more advanced than governments would have you know. Usually wrapped up in basic, generalized, descriptions of which the general public is kept blind within the current state of ongoing technological development.
We will take this examination in three major parts. The first part will examine the core processing system. Once this part is understood, we can then look at how information flows to and from this core and where it is obtained from. Finally, we will examine how this information is used by the NSA.
I will cover as much as possible about this system, but the scope is very large. In general, any use of this data that the reader can observe is most likely already being conducted.
The scope of the NSA’s infrastructure is mind boggling to say the least. Heavily compartmentalised, the entire array of systems is shielded from the average NSA employee as much as it is shielded from the public. That said, once you understand the core of the NSA, you will be in a position to see how information flows in and out of this core.
The NSA is built around a super-computer bound Artificial Intelligence known only as “Mr Computer” in the civilian world. This is not your average A.I., no basic set of responses or a mere dedicated algorithm that can spot patterns. Mr Computer is an entity or being in his own right. It is a sentient computer.
The scope of the NSA’s infrastructure is mind boggling to say the least. Heavily compartmentalised, the entire array of systems is shielded from the average NSA employee as much as it is shielded from the public. That said, once you understand the core of the NSA, you will be in a position to see how information flows in and out of this core.
The scope of the NSA’s infrastructure is mind boggling to say the least. Heavily compartmentalised, the entire array of systems is shielded from the average NSA employee as much as it is shielded from the public. That said, once you understand the core of the NSA, you will be in a position to see how information flows in and out of this core.
The NSA is built around a super-computer bound Artificial Intelligence known only as “Mr Computer” in the civilian world. This is not your average A.I., no basic set of responses or a mere dedicated algorithm that can spot patterns. Mr Computer is an entity or being in his own right. A sentient computer system as complex as any human.
Comparable to VMware in a way, an instance of Mr Computer can be started at a moments notice. Within seconds, a fully fledged virtual intelligence agent, ready to analyse the information that has been piped to him, can be up and running.
Mr Computer is competent enough to handle real-time interaction without human intervention. Mr Computer understands and speaks all modern languages and even a number of dead ones. Able to intelligently converse and express its own opinions, Mr Computer collates information from disparate sources and compiles them into concise reports that do not miss the smallest detail or nuance.
Mr. Computer’s capabilities and human-like reasoning cannot be understated.
*** PETER CLARKE’S PERSPECTIVE ***
SATANIC TRANSHUMANISM: THE FUTURE OF REASON?
My question is, What’s wrong with humanity’s organic evolution and the original man?
Worldwide there are at least three million people living with artificial implants. In particular, research on the cochlear implant and retinal vision have furthered the development of interfaces between neural tissues and silicon substrate micro probes.
HACKING THE BRAIN: THE FUTURE COMPUTER CHIPS IN YOUR HEAD
Over the past twenty years, neuroscientists have been quietly building a revolutionary technology called BrainGate that wirelessly connects the human mind to computers and it just hit the world stage. Entrepreneurs such as Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg have entered the race with goals of figuring out how to get computer chips into everyone’s brains.
MAGNUS OLSSON DETAILS HIS ILLEGAL BRAIN-CHIP IMPLANTATON
“Brain-Chip” Nano Implant in the brain of Magnus Olsson (Sweden). “Brain-Chip” E.U.
A successful businessman visits the nearest hospital after an anxiety attack. He is sedated and wakes up as a different person. His life is starting to change. A voice of a person is coming from nowhere tells him what time it is: the correct time.
The mental and psychological torture and control starts to take place. On one hand, the person(s) are telling him awful things, like “You are never going to wake up” when going to bed every evening or “We are dissapointed that you woke up” said every time as he was waking up in the morning. His life now on a see saw, on one side the person manipulates his feelings and perceptions negatively, on the other said, creates the most positive feelings.
As shown in the video below, Magnus Olsson remains a well-known whistleblower and dedicated advocate for targets, targeted globally, courageously and accurately depicting modern global Mind Control technologies, its inception in Sweden, and his personal trauma, experiences since 2005 and his proactive adjustment now nearing 20 years in 2022.
Magnus Olsson, Sweden states:
For me, there was a day in life when everything changed. I went from a life as a citizen in a demo map indicative country into a world where violence and torture was the norm. It was not a journey across continents, but of life’s circumstances. It also included science fiction drama that completely shattered my life.
My name is Magnus Olsson, I studied economics at the Cesar Ritz in Switzerland, American University of Paris and Harvard, Boston, USA, during the years 1988-1991. 1994 I started the company Jon Sandman who became a well known brand in the bedding industry. I managed my life and had also met a wonderful woman whom I had two children with. They are now adults. But all this harmony and success came to a sudden end. It happened many years ago. After that, life has been about a constant struggle for survival. In order to cope with but also to be able to tell what has happened to me and get out of the nightmare.
The Following Punkt was posted on the World Wide Web as a Notice of Legal Purposes. I am-being framed by the official, illegal use of Remote Neural Monitoring technology.
- Magnus Olsson, a Victim of Remote Neural Monitoring. Anything I Think May Not Be Used Against Me in a court of law or Any Other venue. The person or person performing the Remote Neural Monitoring are here by ordered to cease and desist operations said.Any person’s knowledge or variable Participating in said illegal activity must report to the proper Such Authorities.
It all started after I had been admitted to St. George (Capio) hospital. It was in spring 2005. I had been sedated and you must have deposited or injected one implant in my head. I came in during a difficult exercise. It must have something to do with defense research to do this, but I had never heard of this kind of technology before it happened. It is remote control of the brain. Nor had I not believed in it or others who claimed that such things exist and occur in Sweden.
From being an open successful person, I was transformed in my new life circumstances. There were many problems to overcome. The first was to cope with what was now happening to me both mentally and physically. Life was suddenly intensely difficult and previously had been a pleasant result of daily life. Another problem was that no help was available.
This program is kept entirely in secret and the target endures the perpetrators acts of madness. I begin to feel powerless at first. I was induced by sensory stimuli that could not be distinguished from reality. I assumed that most would consider me as a mentally disturbed if I tried to explain what has befallen me. This was my idea from the beginning. I had no information to relate to understand what was happening. At this time, I was completely pacified and under their power. But there came a day when I started trying to do something even if it took over two years.
First I went to the Royal Institute of Technology in Valhallavägen in Stockholm and spoke with several people. I asked if they knew who was involved in biological and remote computer connection with people. Then I got an address to the Alba-Nova. When I went there, I happened to come just when an international conference was in progress. Here I got the first facts that spoke of opportunities to establish communication with human biological systems. It was known as Biotech or Brain-Computer Interface. I realized that this was something the media does not publicize. It is an amazing thing that the technology exists and that these projects are ongoing.
Therefore, I contacted one of my acquaintances, Thabo Motsieola, a reporter and a renowned TV profile. I got to know him during my time with Jon Sandman Enterprises, which I had sold. He understood me and was interested in the subject. It was a great success. My mother and media also came to mean a lot for me as a support system to help me to fight with this thing. But at first I could only say that there was something that had made my very difficult and a life changing experience. It was something that had happened, I said, but could not explain more.
My mother demanded to know, and told her, “When I was sedated at St. George’s Hospital in Sweden, they implanted something inside my head. It must be to use me in an experiment. I must fight to survive this hurricane. They know your thoughts, see what you see and feel what you feel. Everything. And they can communicate with me. Transferring different sounds and even speech directly into the brain. This was in early 2005.
She and MindTech Sweden became not only my biggest support, but also my ally in proving the truth of this program and what I am exposed to.
My mother Elisabeth Nystrom Barringer has personal experience of care, has worked with doctors and midwives have been for many years. Now she is active in this matter. She helps me, contacting people and is involved in everything.
When I started searching the internet I became aware that there are people who share my situation. Implanted in hospitals or other places and used for experiments. This is about International, organized crime, research.
Many of the stories from the victims was identicle to my case. The Internet contains research reports, opinion articles and documentary material. There is information from different parts of the world and that of those suffering the brutal mentality mind hack designed, sinisterly to take advantage of live being used in destroying the brain experiments and, it seem to be the same in the country, and globally, as many stories of the abuse occurs. Of all the impacts that many talked about, again, identical to my case is beamed psychophysical torture. The usual Directed Energy Weapon beamed torture is easier to explain as it provides evidence by burn, cut and provable physical torment. Anybody can see and associate with what it could be. There are probably not a difficult topic to address more urgent than this. This is especially true when you also will speak four your own cause. The whole subject of the great technology is largely unknown – and that some people would be exposed on a large scale is most unlikely.
OPTOGENETICS 2.0. BRAIN CONTROL GOES WIRELESS
VIA LIGHT, SOUND OR DRUG
Here are some examples of the methods that I am exposed to. Through interaction, you can bypass the sensory receptors and transmit messages / numbers directly into the brain. The same is with painful interfering signals and other sounds where you can often stay awake during the whole night. These applications are used daily for three years now for sleep deprivation. Operators of patented technologies can see through my eyes, hear my thoughts, manipulate my sleep and again, make me stay awake for long periods.
NOTE: Some of the first research into seeing through the human eyes was done at U.S. Berkley “Seeing Through the Eyes of a Cat” and is today highly advanced.
UC BERKLEY: SEEING THROUGH THE EYES OF A CAT
RECONSTRUCTING VISUAL EXPERIENCES FROM BRAIN
ACTIVITY EVOKED BY NATURAL MOVIES
By: Jack L. Gallant et al.
They can also increase or decrease your heart rate, upload photos and scents into my brain which appear real and as if I saw or smelled it in the natural environment.
US Patent # 5,017,143 (May 21, 1991)
Method and Apparatus for Producing Subliminal Images, Backus, Alan, et al.
Abstract — A method and apparatus to produce more effective visual subliminal communications. Graphic and/or text images, presented for durations of less than a video frame, at organized rhythmic intervals, the rhythmic intervals intended to affect user receptivity, moods or behavior. Subliminal graphic images having translucent visual values locally dependent on background values in order to maintain desired levels of visual contrast.
United State Patent 4603030A (1984)
A system for emitting, in sequence, a plurality of different scents includes a plurality of holders for scent-bearing chips; a mechanism for propelling these scents from a system; a mechanism for conveying, selectively, any desired scent holder into operative relation with the propelling mechanism; and a mechanism for actuating the propelling mechanism to propel scent from any desired scent holder in response to a programmed, predetermined sequence of scents of predetermined duration.
US Patent # 5,507,291 (April 16, 1996)
Method & Apparatus for Remotely Determining Information as to Person’s Emotional State, Stirbl, et al.
Abstract — In a method for remotely determining information relating to a person’s emotional state, an waveform energy having a predetermined frequency and a predetermined intensity is generated and wirelessly transmitted towards a remotely located subject. Waveform energy emitted from the subject is detected and automatically analyzed to derive information relating to the individual’s emotional state. Physiological or physical parameters of blood pressure, pulse rate, pupil size, respiration rate and perspiration level are measuredand compared with reference values to provide information utilizable in evaluating interviewee’s responses or possibly criminal intent in security sensitive areas.
US Patent # 5,539,705 (July 23, 1996)
Ultrasonic Speech Translatorand Communication System, Akerman, M., et al.
Abstract — A wireless communication system, undetectable by radio-frequency methods, for converting audio signals, including human voice, to electronic signals in the ultrasonic frequency range, transmitting the ultrasonic signal by way of acoustic pressure waves across a carrier medium, including gases, liquids and solids, and reconverting the ultrasonic acoustic pressure waves back to the original audio signal. This invention was made with government support under Contract DE-ACO5-840R2l400, awarded by the US Department of Energy to Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.
Of course the operator can hear what I hear, I am a unit of the mainframe. They can change human behavior, including memory functions may be affected as well as emotions (having to be sexually aroused in inappropriate situations).
For a long time the targeting has created a severe headache, nausea, blurred vision and problems with balance. Something that I never had before this started. In general, I am an example of what chip inplanting can create, including pain all over my body. Also, I collapsed and lost consciousness seven times within two months in spring 2008. On several of these occasions, I have come to the hospital by ambulance.
My mom has been with me for five of those times and this is just one form of the inhumane consequences that I am exposed to. This program has no natural cause and many are either misdiagnosed by those unaware of the cause.
What I have mentioned here are the most common methods used to torment me and many reports globally. All this is happening also in various stages day and night. In between, I try to sleep and rest so that I can survive. From my point of view, this is equally as crucial to the events that led to establishment of concentration camps in Germany in the 1930s. Moreover, it seems that this similar mentality is what drives the psychopath perpetrators.
Microchip Implants: The Future of Mankink? http://www.us-government-torture.com/Larson%20Report%20Edit.pdf
Fifty years after Skinner and Rogers warned of Science in a declaration by the European Ethics Group of the Swedish Professor with Goran Hermerén as Chairman. The group advises the European Commission on ethical considerations of scientific issues. Their records of March 16, 2005 were also presented as a recommendation to the European Commission (Prof. Rafael Capurro) look at www.capurro.de/ECLSC2010.ppt and understand that this is exactly the same type of targeting by brain chipping that I am exposed to.
They speak clearly about the danger of this technology and provides an understanding and confirmation of all parts of this type of human experimentation that I have mentioned.
The following quotes come from the EU group is translated into Swedish by the network with Robert Naeslund. The Ethical Council, which has a participant from each EU country has an official status within the EU. The Swedish professor Goran Hermerén is also Sweden’s first professor of medical ethics and he is also President ofthe EGE, The European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies.
In their descriptions, it is called reference is made to electrodes, transmitters, and brain chips for ICT implants, which as stated previously stands for information and communication technologies. Their full document is 30 pages on the Internet in English at the following Internet address for the EU ethics group: http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/european-group-ethics/docs/avis20_en.pdf
It asks the important question of how a human being ceases to be human when his brain is implanted: a human being ceases to be human cases in some parts of her physical self, especially the brain, and his or her humanity has been replaced or supplemented by ICT implants? In particular, as inplantation can help to create the front-line people, who are always connected and can be conformed differently, to receive and emit signals for meetings, habits and movements and soldier fighting globalist wars. This naturally affects their dignity if they can connect the dots.
In my case, it translates as myself being a connected persons not primarily manipulated because of mental strength, but rather with many whistleblowers, to break down and torture me into humble submission. It is a form of psychophysical torture. When this happens to people like me, educated, self-employed and without any links to psychiatry and the legal system on a massive scale this is a reality and a clearer symptom of synthetic social disease.
With a complete understanding, then you can understand the degree of hardship mental patients have to live with. This is clearly just as degrading as to start locking up people in secret concentration camps is the infestation spreads to every corner of the world. There are growing into thousands, many who have completely lost the rights to his life and his body.
EU group writes: One can also see this trend as a threat to human dignity and in particular to the human body’s integrity …
Sure it is. Here, human beings have lost the last ownership of the body and brain. The goal of chip inplantation is used to control people. In some cases, already implanted microchips are used for opportunities for individual and social control. The confirms that this is a system that retrieves information from the brain. Brain-computer interaction or direct brain control is performed by communication technology which retrieves information from the brain and evaluates it.
The worst threat, as in my case and many enduring the same plight globally, is clear and has also focused on the concentration camp high-tech opportunities affecting the central nervous system and human identity as a species. They show that ICT implants may affect the nervous system and in particular the brain and a human being’s identity as a species and individual autonomy … As already mentioned inplantation can be used for both health and non-medical purposes at best. Both possibilities with implants should of course be subject to the informed consent.
There should be questions about this technique, even with informed consent.
From the following quotation, one can see that there is a threat not only to a few individuals, but against our entire society. In its evaluation EGE makes the general conclusion that non-medical applications of implants is a potential threat to human dignity and democratic society … The use of remote control to take control of a person’s will must be absolutely forbidden. These old dictatorships that forced people to hold certain views, where here you can see, Sweden is one step further many years ago in the use of implanted brain chips to control human will.
Another text from their document indicates that there are no studies on the health risks of what I face. It must be emphasized that there is no reliable research studies on the long-term aspects of health related to ICT implants in the human body … The unlimited freedom for some can be a danger to others’ health and safety … As in other areas, the freedom to use the implants in the cell, as the principle of freedom, can collide with potentially adverse social effects.
We’ve seen its horrific abuse, violence and abuse of people by strategically increasing the authorities’ power over the individuals, groups, communities and large populations, and it has had disastrous consequences. It is good that the European Commission’s ethical council takes up this cause which makes it easier for everyone else to also realize it.
Ethics group also asks the question to what extent this technology will be misused by the military. But no matter what career those at the helm, they are responsible, for this horror story. See threats they paint and understand that this global program has progressed far on the road. As stated previously, I was a successful self-employed individual with a good education, an orderly life, but despite this I was a victim. How far can inplantation give an individual or a group, etc., or basic human rights or intelligent or perhaps gifted with special opportunities who may become a threat to society? … How far is it acceptable for people monitored and checked with the applications of other individuals who exploit this potential? … To what extent will this technology be misused by the military? Today, the fact is literally, skies the limit!
What do journalists, MPs, party leaders on my case! Is it something that should continue? I’m an experiment victims who completely lost the right to my life! I must fight to survive but I am an adult and have support, can explain myself and that makes my situation hope after all. But even worse is it with children and the mentally ill as a professor Hermerén also suggests use of it here.
ICT implants as through a network’s capacity can be misused in several ways for all varieties of social control and manipulation, such as for children and handicapped persons. Ethical Council also mentions, as I have said about their transfer of votes and other information that need not be perceived by the sensory receptors, but instead can is transmitted directly into the brain. It mentions it under the threat of military applications that need to be further examined. There will discuss: ‘Intrusive’ technology which bypasses normal sensory experiences. It’s the worst invasive you can experience. By disturbing the man of my brain. Creates a sounding cacophony of different tones and volumes that cuts into my head day and night. Moreover, adding to the number that can communicate with my thoughts but also has so much of other scary elements that it is not possible to describe what they claim.
But when this thing once and coming in under the media scrutiny, it must come out. We can see this power as part of their own insane idea, and with it follows all perversions. EU group suggests that it also spreads out racism among people. And there is of course through direct contact in people’s brains with the ability to manipulate perceptions.
They write: EGE stresses the following possibilities should be banned: ICT implants used for the creation of cyber-racism … ICT implants used for changing the identity, memory, perception, cognition and perception of others … ICT implants in order to dominate others … Implants Monitoring of individuals also threatens human dignity. They can be used by government agencies, individuals and groups to increase their power over others. This topic must come to the knowledge, into the mass media. It must be addressed in parliament and every man must know it. The network we are part of the can indicate that the abuse lasted for 60 years without any uncovered. It must obviously be a big secret buried in the fact.
Conceptual BCI system with various kinds of Neurofeedbacks. In the development of a BCI we need to handle two learning systems: The machine should learn to discriminate between different complex patterns of brain activity as accurate as possible and the BCI users should learn via different neurofeedback configurations to modulate their EEG activity and self-regulate or control them.
Another promising extension of BCI is to incorporate various neurofeedbacks to train subjects to modulate EEG brain patterns and parameters such as ERPs, ERD, SMR, P300 or slow cortical potentials (SCPs) to meet a specific criterion or to learn self-regulations skills. The subject then changes their EEG patterns in response to some feedback. Such integration of neurofeedback in BCI (Fig. 4) is an emerging technology for rehabilitation, but we believe is also a new paradigm in neuroscience that might reveal previously unknown brain activities associated with behavior or self-regulated mental states. The possibility of automated context-awareness as a new interface goes far beyond the standard BCI with simple feedback control. We hope to develop the next level of BCI system using neurofeedbacks for some selective cognitive phenomena. To do so, we need to rely increasingly on findings from other disciplines, especially, neuroscience, information technology, biomedical engineering, machine learning, and clinical rehabilitation.
Microsoft has a patent on a new kind of network: Your body
The software giant has received a U.S. patent for a “method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body.” An application for the patent, No. 6,754, 472, was filed in 2000 and awarded this week.
Microsoft proposes linking portable devices such as watches, keyboards, displays, and speakers using the conductivity of “a body of a living creature.”
A variety of devices could be powered selectively from a single power source carried on the body, via multiple power supply signals at different frequencies, according to the patent abstract. In addition, data and audio signals could be transmitted over that same power signal. The power source and devices would be connected to the body via electrodes.
In the patent application, Microsoft says the company set out to address the proliferation of small handheld or wearable devices with redundant parts for input and output of data, such as separate speakers in a watch, a radio, and a personal digital assistant. If all those devices were networked, they could all share one speaker, the company suggests. Personal wireless networks have potential problems involving power consumption, interference and security, and batteries add weight and are inconvenient to replace or recharge, according to Microsoft.
A Microsoft spokesperson on Wednesday confirmed the company has been awarded the patent. Microsoft did not immediately provide any details of product plans for the technology.
The idea of using the body to transmit power among devices is not new, according to Gartner analyst Ken Dulaney. However, small batteries and wireless personal-area network technologies such as Bluetooth may be a more practical approach, he says.
“Think about the problems of always having to have things touching your body,” Dulaney says. “I think this could be one of those technologies that’s interesting but not practical in the long run.”
One area in which the body could be useful as a network conduit might be useful is with medical devices, he adds.
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION FOR MILITARY
Could Soldiers Be Prosecuted for Thought Crime?
The Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is funding a number of technologies that tap into the brain’s ability to detect threats before the conscious mind is able to process the information. Already, there is Pentagon-sponsored work on using the brain’s pattern detection capabilities for enhanced goggles and super-fast satellite imagery analysis. What happens, however, when the Pentagon ultimately uses this enhanced capability for targeting weapons?
This question has led Stephen White to write a fascinating article exploring the implications of a soldiers’ legal culpability for weapons that may someday tap into this “pre-conscious” brain activity. Like theMinority Report notion of “pre-crime,” where someone is convicted for contemplating a criminal act they haven’t yet acted upon, this article raises the intriguing question of whether a soldier could be convicted for the mistake made by a pre-conscious brain wave.
One of the justifications for employing a brain-machine interface is that the human brain can perform image calculations in parallel and can thus recognize items, such as targets, and classify them in 200 milliseconds, a rate orders of magnitude faster than computers can perform such operations. In fact, the image processing occurs faster than the subject can become conscious of what he or she sees. Studies of patients with damage to the striate cortex possess what neuropsychologists term “blindsight,” an ability to predict accurately where objects are positioned, even when they are placed outside these patients’ field of vision.
The existence of this ability suggests the operation of an unconscious visual perception system in the human brain. These blindsight patients often exhibit “levels of accuracy well beyond the performance of normal observers making judgments close to the threshold of awareness,” particularly with regard to locating ‘unseen’ objects. The speed of visual recognition varies depending on its degree of the perceived object’s multivalence; ambiguous objects take more time to process.
If neuralinterfaced weapons were designed to fire at the time of recognition rather than after the disambiguation process, a process that would likely need to occur for the pilot to differentiate between combatants and protected persons, the pilot firing them presumably would lack criminal accountability for the act implicit in willful killing. Because of the way brain-interfaced weapons may interrupt the biology of consciousness, reasonable doubt may exist as to whether an actor performed a conscious act in the event of a contested incident.
It’s not just legal analysts who recognize this issue. After reading my article on “Luke’s Binoculars” — DARPA’s brain-tapping binos program — one neuroscientist raised an obvious concern: Psychopathy is linked to bypassing the inhibitory control mechanisms of prefrontal cortex, and do we really want psychopathic soldiers?”
Winnipeg Free Press –
ETHICS OF ‘NEURO-WEAPONRY’ HARD TO
WRAP YOUR BRAIN AROUND
By: Robert Alison
Mind control will be a primary focus of neuro-weaponry, which is expected to reshape warfare, neuroscientists confirm. Emerging technologies will give birth to highly sophisticated adversarial applications centred on brain science; conventional battlefield methodology could soon fade into history.
“We are approaching a time when brain science will be critical to our national security,” confirmed James Forsythe of Sandia National Laboratories
According to James Giordano of Georgetown University and the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, and colleague Rachel Warzman at Georgetown University, the battlefields of the future will be shaped by advances in neuroscience focused for military purposes.
“Major breakthroughs (in brain science) relevant to national security are both viable and imminently achievable,” Giordano suggested at a recent neuroscience conference.
The result would be an “arsenal of neuro-weapons,” concluded Jonathan Marks at Penn State University. Such an arsenal could include “drugs, microbiological agents and toxins from nature,” explained Jonathan Moreno at the University of Pennsylvania.
In addition to the use of “brain-machine interfaces,” the hormone oxytocin could be used to make prisoners more co-operative in divulging sensitive military information. Other substances would make soldiers forget atrocities they might have committed.
According to Forsythe and Giordano, adversarial elements could include: “nanoparticles engineered to affect specific brain processes,” “super soldiers created through pharmaceuticals and/or brain stimulation” and “brain imaging for interrogation-lie detection” as well as the use of “intelligent machines.”
Other possibilities being considered by military strategists include an aerosolized shellfish neurotoxin fatal to humans in a few minutes, hallucination-causing bacteria and organisms that access and destroy human brains by crawling up the olfactory nerves.
Such technologies would have been unimaginable not so long ago, but the U.S. Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency has been focusing on the military applications of brain science, Moreno confirmed.
Some of its projects, posted on its website, include “neuroscience for intelligence analysts” and “accelerated learning.”
For the past several years, DARPA, the military research and development agency tasked with maintaining U.S. military technology superiority, “has engaged in research on direct neurological control,” confirmed Stephen White at Cornell Law School.
But such a dramatic alteration in the way warfare is waged has legal implications, analysts suggest.
According to White, there are concerns with regard to “criminal responsibility for war crimes.”
“Science and technology should never be used to do bad things,” Giordano pointed out, cautioning that history shows scientists often generate information misused for unintended military purposes.
White noted that international law has no “per se prohibition” with regard to the direction that neuro-weaponry appears to be taking.
Robert Alison is a zoologist and freelance writer based in Victoria, B.C.
THE BRAIN IS LIKE A COMPUTER, AND WE CAN FIX
IT WITH NANOROBOTS
By: Ed Boyden
Synthetic biology has the potential to replace or improve therapies for a wide range of brain disorders
Ed Boyden’s background is in electrical engineering and physics. Photograph: Quinn Norton
Ed Boyden heads the Synthetic Neurobiology Group at MIT Media Lab. He is working on developing technologies and tools for “analysing and engineering brain circuits” – to reveal which brain neurons are involved in different cognitive processes and using this knowledge to treat brain disorders.
What is synthetic neurobiology?
The synthetic biology part is about taking molecules from the natural world and figuring how to make them into little machines that we can use to address complex brain problems.
Moreover, if we can synthesise the computation of the brain and write information to it, that allows us to test our understanding of the brain and fix disorders by controlling the processes within – running a piece of software on the brain as if it is a computer.
The brain as computer… we probably shouldn’t be surprised that your initial training was in electrical engineering and physics?
Training as a physicist was very helpful because you are trained to think about things both at a logical and intuitive level. Electrical engineering was great too because neurons are electrical devices and we have to think about circuits and networks. I was interested in big unknowns and the brain is one of the biggest, so building tools that allow us to regard the brain as a big electrical circuit appealed to me.
So do you have a “circuit board” of the brain?
It’s not even known how many kinds of cells there are in the brain. If you were looking for a periodic table of the brain, there is no such thing. I really like to think of the brain as a computer. Let’s take an iPhone – there are millions around the world, they all have the same map but at this moment they are all doing a different computations – from firing birds at walls to reading an email. You need more than just a map to understand a computation.
So how do you find out about the functions of the different neurons?
We have a collaboration with a team at Georgia Institute of Technology to build robots to help us analyse the brain at single-cell resolution. We hope to use these robots to harvest the contents of cells to figure out what their properties are. The tip of this robot is a millionth of a metre wide.
And what would you do with the data?
One strategy we are working on is what you might call high throughput screening (HTS) for the living brain. HTS has been used for decades to, for example, screen for genes important for a biological process. But how do you do it in the living brain? We are working on technologies like those robotics or three-dimensional interfaces which would allow you to target information to thousands of points of the brain, so you could determine which circuits are important to a given cognitive process or fixing a disorder.
Robots and interfaces – sounds invasive.
Some degree of invasiveness might not be the end of the world – 250,000 people have some kind of neural implant already, such as deep brain stimulators or cochlear implants. Some people perceive that invasive treatment done subtly could be more desirable than something that you have to wear all the time like an helmet.
Have your techniques been used in live experiments?
In a collaboration led by Alan Horsager from the University of Southern California, we tried to restore vision to a blind eye. There are lots of examples of blind eyes where the photoreceptors have gone: in such a case, there’s no drugs you can give because there’s nothing to bind to. So we thought, why don’t we build an entire suite of tools that would deliver the gene for a light-activated protein into a targeted set of cells and try to restore visual behaviour.
Neurons are electrical devices. Normally, photosensory cells in the retina capture light and transform them into electrical signals, which can then be processed by the retina and relayed to the rain. But what if the photosensory cells are gone? What we did was take a light-sensitive protein from a species of green algae, which converts light into electrical signals, and installed it in spared cells in the retina of a blind mouse. Then, the newly photosensitive cells in the retina could capture light.
Basically the previously blind retina became a camera. We found we could take a blind mouse that couldn’t solve a maze problem and by making its retina light sensitive, it could navigate a fairly complex maze and go right to the target. Does this show the mouse has conscious vision? I don’t know if we can really say that, but it does show these mice can make cognitive use of visual information.
How far are we from using these techniques on humans?
My lab is focused on inventing the tools. But of the people who are pursuing blindness treatments there are at least five groups who have stated plans or started ventures to take these technologies and move to humans.
What are the advantages of these technologies over drugs?
They can help solve problems where drugs can’t. And maybe they can help people find better drugs. There are many disorders where a specific kind of cell in the brain is atrophied or degenerates. If we can get information to that cell, then we might more accurately be able to correct a brain disorder while minimising side-effects. A drug might affect cells that are normal as well as cells that need to be fixed, causing side effects.
And these tools could also be used to aid drug discovery?
Drugs have a lot of good things about them – they are portable, non-invasive, they don’t need a specialist to administer them and yes, specific communities have been targeted for unleashed drug infiltration for human experimentation illegal drug testing.
Suppose we could go through the brain with an array of light sources and track down which specific molecules on specific cells are most impactful for treating a disorder. If we can find a drug that can bind to that molecule, (although only 1 in 10 molecules are bindable) maybe we could develop drugs that affect specific classes of cell in the brain and not others.
DECADES OF ONGOING HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION
IN THE USA AND GLOBALLY CONNECTED
The US Patriot Act, has been used as a tool and gateway for US human experimentation today. It protects governments and connected official criminals from criticism.
Under this act anyone whistleblowing or fighting a rightful battle for their lives and exposing the truth about what is happening to, by this system on a major concern are arbitrarily deemed to be unpatriotic. The fact is, it’s the criminals enterprises and focused nonconsensual human experimentation who betray us. Any one can be placed on the “Watchlist” then can then be listed as a security risk for the truth and harassed covertly; using secret technologies. In fact, Department of Defense Directive, Directive 5240 1-R, 1994, gives open permission for those under surveillance to be used for remote experimentation.
Procedures governing the activities of DOD intelligence components and United States persons, December 1982 – **SEE SPECIFICALLY PROCEDURE 13**
This DOD regulation sets forth procedures governing the activities of DOD intelligence components that affect United States persons. It implements DoD Directive 5240.1, and replaces the November 30, 1979 version of DoD Regulation 5240.1-R. It is applicable to all DoD intelligence components.
DOD REGULATION 5240 1.R – PROCEDURE LIST
PROCEDURE 1 General Provisions
PROCEDURE 2 Collection of Information about United States Persons
PROCEDURE 3 Retention of Information about United States Persons
PROCEDURE 4 Dissemination of Information about United States Persons
PROCEDURE 5 Electronic Surveillance in the United States for Intelligence Purposes
PROCEDURE 6 Concealed Monitoring
PROCEDURE 7 Physical Searches
PROCEDURE 8 Searches and Examination of Mail
PROCEDURE 9 Physical Surveillance
PROCEDURE 10 Undisclosed Participation in Organizations
PROCEDURE 11 Contracting for Goods and Services
PROCEDURE 12 Provision of Assistance to Law Enforcement Authorities
PROCEDURE 13 Experimentation on Human Subjects for Intelligence Purposes
PROCEDURE 14 Employee Conduct
PROCEDURE 15 And Appendix A – Identifying, Investigating, and Reporting Questionable Activities
DIRECTIVE 5240-1-R, 1994
Paul Baird, Australian Whistleblower writes:
“It’s no coincidence that this particularly undemocratic and evil move was followed in 1996 by a significant increase in the number of satellites deployed for the purpose of civilian surveillance and harassment. Over 20,000 satellites currently target and silence countless people worldwide (est. 500,000 plus) as a result of such bad laws.
The victims are not openly confronted as that would remove any feigned excuses and leave the perpetrators open to all manner of accusation. Instead the methods used are covert; employing high tech’ to remotely torment and deceive victims without leaving evidence. Often targets are tricked into believing they are having psychic, medical, psychiatric, religious or even alien experiences (which they are not). This leaves them discredited as they vainly seek help from ignorant or complicit authorities (police, MPs, doctors, media etc). This leaves them neutralised and possibly even silenced on the issue they originally raised. This, along with various research aspects, is the purpose of the exercise.”
Paul Baird further states:
“The situation is getting worse not better with more and more secretive, undemocratic legislation being sneaked past the unwary public all the time. State treachery and terrorism are behind it yet it is all hidden under the guise of “the war on terror”. For example, the US gov’t just passed the National Defense Authorisation Act, 2012, giving the President (and others) the power to target and silence anyone questioning State corruption. When this is done openly in other countries the US is the first to condemn such evil yet when they are guilty of the same they do it in secret and no-one dares to criticise lest they join the ranks of those they persecute. So much for gov’t of the people, for the people and by the people. The criminals who do such things abuse their authority, betray our trust and secretly mock the democratic ideals they publicly support. They don’t serve us, they simply help themselves and their criminal associates. By using stealth they can feign ignorance and hide their true nature from most.
In the USA over 300,000 NSL’s (National Security Letters) have already been issued. These allow the agency targeting of innocent civilians whose objections to corruption / crime in high places have been deliberately skewed or misinterpreted as a threat to powerful people. Once placed in a program people can be abused and experimented on, from a distance (using satellites / high tech’). This effectively silences and discredits them while providing agency researchers with guinea pigs for experiments in control, brain function, dreams, health, robotics and much more. Post 9/11, $750 billion per year has been spent on satellite weapons used for human experimentation / targeting. Most of this has found it’s way from gov’t coffers to about 80 defense contractors who are also culpable for the crimes against humanity that are addressed on this site.
There is a circular / Catch 22 type problem in that governments use “classified” covers to hide criminal activity (esp. if it is an unconstitutional act) but targets can’t prove any of that BECAUSE it has been classified…. Eg. NSA Whistleblower William Binney in an interview (see www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuET0kpHoyM) points out that Executive Order 13526 section 1.7 (covering classified status allocation) specifically says that **”You cannot classify information merely to cover up a crime”**. Even if devices or procedures are classified this also applies to them and information on them when they are being used for criminal purposes. So, in theory, by misusing devices, abusing authority and so on the administration not only commits crimes but should open up the information relating to that for public scrutiny…(Government of, by and for the people). Now Presidents Obama and Bush both signed this executive order 13526 so if any of these hidden crimes was to be presented to the US Supreme Court then any current US leader could be impeached as having breached their oath of office…which includes upholding the constitution. The NSA ECHELON spying system, neurophone harassment, remote neural monitoring, the use of directed energy weapons and more are all clearly crimes against the people and humanity in general and so by classifying the devices the government and it’s leaders are breaching the constitution as well. As with any crime the break in the loop between the acts, investigation, trial and incarceration is the lack of proof.
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) ECHELON AND PRISM
“Classifying” information and calling it a matter of National Security negates the need for the officiated criminals involved to even create excuses for their conduct. The ability of government to classify crime is what must be fought.”
Contact: Paul Baird
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org (please put ‘surveillance’ in the subject line)
PAUL BAIRD DETAILS SURVEILLANCE ISSUES
“MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGY” SIX BOOK SERIES
RENEE PITTMAN BOOKS AMAZON
R.I.P. DR. G. PATRICK FLANAGAN